{"id":1366,"date":"2010-01-01T05:37:37","date_gmt":"2010-01-01T05:37:37","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/glaringnotebook.com\/?p=1366"},"modified":"2010-01-01T05:37:37","modified_gmt":"2010-01-01T05:37:37","slug":"optic-ah","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/glaringnotebook.com\/?p=1366","title":{"rendered":"Optic-Ah!"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/www.glaringnotebook.com\/zimages\/optekb1.jpg\"><br \/>\nAnd now, for more from the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.glaringnotebook.com\/?p=1365\">Opteka 85mm F1.4<\/a>! <a href=\"http:\/\/feliciazoe.blogspot.com\" target=\"_BLANK\">Felicia<\/a> shot at F1.4 at <a href=\"http:\/\/www.807studio.com\" target=\"_BLANK\">807 Studio<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/www.glaringnotebook.com\/zimages\/optekb2.jpg\"><br \/>\nI also took the opportunity to compare it to the Sony Carl Zeiss Planar T* 85mm F1.4 ZA &#8211; something I may not want to do in fear of finding my lens inferior. Fortunately, it wasn&#8217;t the case&#8230; strongly. Here&#8217;s the Opteka 85mm F1.4 focused to 1 meter, its minimum focusing distance.<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/www.glaringnotebook.com\/zimages\/optekb3.jpg\"><br \/>\nThe Zeiss 85mm F1.4, however, magnifies a lot more because:<\/p>\n<p>1) it can focus to 85cm close<br \/>\n2) it has external focus<\/p>\n<p>Internal focus lenses tend to widen the angle of view, thus causing lesser magnification.<\/p>\n<p>For example, the Sony 135mm F2.8\/T4.5 Smooth Transition Focus lens focuses to 87cm close, giving a 1:4x maximum magnification. It is an external focus lens.<\/p>\n<p>The Sony Carl Zeiss Sonnar T* 135mm F1.8 ZA can focus to 72cm close&#8230; so logically, it should be able to get closer and get a better magnification, right? However, as it is internal focus, its angle of view widens at close range, and so it gets the same 1:4x maximum magnification as the STF!<\/p>\n<p>So, there are benefits to external focus lenses.<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/www.glaringnotebook.com\/zimages\/optekb4.jpg\"><br \/>\nSize-wise they are quite similiar. Both use 72mm filter threads.<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/www.glaringnotebook.com\/zimages\/optekb5.jpg\"><br \/>\nThe Zeiss hood can literally eat the Opteka hood!<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/www.glaringnotebook.com\/zimages\/optekb6.jpg\"><br \/>\nAnd how about a portrait comparison? Opteka 85mm F1.4 at F1.4 1\/100s ISO800.<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/www.glaringnotebook.com\/zimages\/optekb8.jpg\"><br \/>\nHere&#8217;s the same thing from the Zeiss at the same settings.<\/p>\n<p>Honestly, at a glance, the overall contrast looks very similiar! Also, the Opteka is very capable of picking up ambient colors the way the Zeiss does. Please pardon that the Opteka has a slightly different focus plane.<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/www.glaringnotebook.com\/zimages\/optekb7.jpg\"><br \/>\nIt is only when you start pixel-peeping that you see why the Zeiss costs 4 times the price&#8230; this is a 100% crop from the Opteka. It is pretty sharp wide open!<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/www.glaringnotebook.com\/zimages\/optekb9.jpg\"><br \/>\nHowever, this is a 100% crop from the Zeiss! The keyword here is microcontrast &#8211; it has far more contrasty details.<\/p>\n<p>I would say that after this exercise, I understood what the Zeiss microcontrast thing was all about. The Opteka is really 80% of the Zeiss, for 25% the price!<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/www.glaringnotebook.com\/zimages\/optekb10.jpg\"><br \/>\nI also tried the Opteka on the Sony Alpha 550 &#8211; this used MF Check Live View. Works great even at 7x zoom (14x zoom is a bit too shaky for a 85mm lens.)<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/www.glaringnotebook.com\/zimages\/optekb11.jpg\"><br \/>\nAccuracy even at no zoom using MF Check LV was pretty good!<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/www.glaringnotebook.com\/zimages\/optekb12.jpg\"><br \/>\nHowever, when I tried to use the Quick AF Live View mode, manual-focusing using the LCD, it just seemed to be off all the time. However I could notice a slight sharpening happening in Quick AF Live View mode.<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/www.glaringnotebook.com\/zimages\/optekb14.jpg\"><br \/>\nFinally, don&#8217;t fear the 1 meter minimum focusing distance &#8211; you can dismount the lens and turn it the other way around. You can even control the aperture using the aperture ring!<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/www.glaringnotebook.com\/zimages\/optekb13.jpg\"><br \/>\nIt gives about 70mm for a 36mm-wide sensor, or 1:1.94x maximum magnification.<\/p>\n<p>In other news, there might be a Samyang 35mm F1.4:<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.lenstip.com\/index.php?art=122\" target=\"_BLANK\">http:\/\/www.lenstip.com\/index.php?art=122<\/a><\/p>\n<p>I would buy that no questions asked! Knowing the obscene quality of the Samyang 85mm F1.4 you can bet the 35mm is going to be a winner. Since it is a full-frame wide-angle it should have a better MFD than the Sigma 30mm F1.4&#8217;s mediocre 40cm. (The Sigma looks nice on FF despite the vignetting!)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>And now, for more from the Opteka 85mm F1.4! Felicia shot at F1.4 at 807 Studio. I also took the opportunity to compare it to the Sony Carl Zeiss Planar T* 85mm F1.4 ZA &#8211; something I may not want to do in fear of finding my lens inferior. Fortunately, it wasn&#8217;t the case&#8230; strongly. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[13,19],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1366","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-geek","category-pictures"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/glaringnotebook.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1366","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/glaringnotebook.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/glaringnotebook.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/glaringnotebook.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/glaringnotebook.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1366"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/glaringnotebook.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1366\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/glaringnotebook.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1366"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/glaringnotebook.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1366"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/glaringnotebook.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1366"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}